home home

Plot Plotting

June 30th, 2010 by Sara

Today I got out a rag and cleaned off my white board. The wide open surface and blissfully erasable markers make it the perfect tool for me to see my story as one big picture. Once I have it there, I can see where the action falls and whether events should come sooner or later. Where it might be dragging or maybe overwhelming the reader with information.

It’s an interesting exercise, but it can also be a confusing one. Everyone agrees that stories should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. But the theories on just how these should play out are endless and often contradictory. People write whole books on the subject, make their living teaching seminars about it, and create graphs detailing just how and when tension should rise or fall.


These differing pictures of plot are confusing enough without even mentioning three act structure or the hero’s journey or A and B plots.

The truth is that each book is different and plot often can’t be distilled down to an x and y axis. But it’s still important that we ask ourselves: How do we keep the tension going in a story? How do we hook the reader over and over so that they keep reading? How do we divvy out information? How do we reveal secrets? Which scenes do we show and which do we skip over?

Pacing and tension are some of the most challenging things to do in a book and though editors might be able to help you shore up your story structure, you’ll never get that help if an editor isn’t interested enough to read your book in the first place. So I keep some personal rules in mind.

Graphs and theories can be infinitely helpful tools when it comes to creating novels. But the key is to listen to your story and trust that it will find its own way through. Beginning. Middle. And End.

Posted in Characters, Hooks, Writing

Lex Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 10:49 am

Great post. I especially like the white-board idea–so simple I may have to go out and get one myself. You might like this post I did–similar stuff from a visual perspective: http://www.kidbeowulf.com/?p=1771

Sara Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 10:52 am

Nice! I love seeing the visual equivalent of revision. And I’m envious! It’s very powerful to be able to _see_ changes as they happen and why they happen. Sigh. All I can show is heavy-duty drafts piling up:)
Oh! and definitely get yourself a white-board! You won’t regret it:)

Laurie Young Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 11:12 am

It sounds so simple. Thanks Sara for distilling this confusing process down to easily actionable points. I am running out to get my white board today!

Sara Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 11:15 am

Little do you know that I’m in the pocket of the erasable marker companies! We thank you for your patronage;)

Monique Ruiz Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 4:11 pm

The problem can be the solution. You’ve mentioned this before, and I’m so glad I read this before an upcoming workshop. Now I can ask the writers, “What seems to be the problem?”

Thanks, Sara, and have a Happy Fourth!

Rita Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 11:20 pm

Funny. I wrote my own writing guide down today, listing the guiding points I remind myself of over and over as I make my way through my manuscript. In case I ever wanted to hand them out (or in case I ever forgot!).

I should post them online!

Your “the problem can be the solution” is one of my favorites. :D

Sara Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 11:44 pm

Awesome! If you do end up writing them down, you should put a link here in the comments so people can look at both:)

Edith Cohn Says:
July 3rd, 2010 at 1:56 pm

Oooh a whiteboard. Why don’t I own one of these?

Suzanne Casamento Says:
July 19th, 2010 at 5:39 pm

Why do I get the feeling you were thinking of me when you wrote “Be mean to your characters”? ;)

Excellent post. Great writing rules!

Sara Says:
July 19th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

Suzanne… I have _no_ idea what you’re talking about;)

Lee Wind Says:
July 28th, 2010 at 12:15 pm

I love the notion of characters being “volatile chemicals” who will “find their own way through the plot.” That’s awesome. And so are you!
Namaste and a Hug,
Lee

Janet Says:
July 28th, 2010 at 12:31 pm

Thanks to Lee Wind for tweeting this post. Excellent insight. And you are so right when you write: “Graphs and theories can be infinitely helpful tools when it comes to creating novels. But the key is to listen to your story and trust that it will find its own way through.” Thanks for that much needed reminder as I set aside my “structure” and dive head first into my 3rd novel.

Leave a Comment »


Hearing Your Story

June 14th, 2010 by Sara

Writing a new story is like inhabiting a new world. It doesn’t matter whether you’re writing about high school crushes or aliens or high school crushes on aliens, there are strangers you’ve never met, unfamiliar landscapes, traditions you don’t yet understand. And the trick is, you don’t just need to get to know this new world, you have to make it come to life in full technicolor glory.

Some people suggest that when writing crucial scenes in your book, you should employ at least three out of the five senses. As in: “Sara listened to the computer hum impatiently while she tried to think of a good example. She stalled, grimacing as she took a gulp of bitter coffee-gone-cold. The shiny, smooth keys of her computer beckoned her to be brilliant, but alas, she wrote this instead.”

TDiorama mess!his is a great technique and I like to expand it to the story creation process. Because unless the world feels real to you, in all five senses, it’s not going to feel real to the reader. Bringing your fiction into the physical world anchors you in your character’s voice and setting in a way that nothing else does. So in the past I’ve talked about building dioramas, collecting shoe boxes full of stuff my character loves, and, most importantly for me, finding a soundtrack to my story.

In my last project, I incessantly listened to the soundtrack to Battlestar Galactica, letting its Taiko drums and wailing flutes build tension and tone in my writing space. I can’t help but feel that the words are infused with a sense of that music, much like honey is flavored by the flowers that bees visit.

Sigur Ros So when I started a new story, I felt lost without music for my new world. I started avidly listening to the radio, asking friends what they were listening to, paying attention to soundtracks in movies. At the same time, I was searching for the voice of my main character. For a while, writing was frustrating, my words feeling more like an outline than a book. Then I found Sigur Ros.

This Icelandic band has a raw tone that feels bleak and wistful and, occasionally, soaringly hopeful. The first song I heard by them stunned me. I could literally see one of my key scenes unfolding in my mind. It was like being given a key to this world I had been circling and spying on for so long. Suddenly, I could walk with my character through the streets of my story. Amazingly, when my husband heard the same song later, he had the same experience. For weeks I’d been talking about this world, about this character, bouncing ideas off of him, and this song triggered the same emotions in him as it did in me.  Now I could not only visualize my world, I could hear it too. And in the space of one song, my story had come to life.

Posted in Characters, First draft, Writing

tony Says:
June 16th, 2010 at 10:43 am

i remember my first high school alien crush. the memories are still bittersweet.

this is an amazing post, and it made me remember why i love listening to music so much while i work. and i’m so glad you found sigur ros! it sounds exactly like your book :)

irvin Says:
June 16th, 2010 at 11:12 am

I love this post. I listen to music constantly, and it informs me whenever I am creating…not matter if it is design, writing, baking or something else.

Also, I ADORE Sigur Rós! If you haven’t heard it, check out the lead singer Jonsi’s solo album GO. It’s equally fantastic. It’s more upbeat than Sigur Rós’ stuff, while still sounding epic.

Sara Says:
June 16th, 2010 at 11:23 am

I _have_ heard GO and I love it! One of Jonsi’s songs is the credit music to How To Train a Dragon… which I also love:) So I became a fan. It’s actually most likely how I found my way to Sigur Ros, now that I think about it.

GO is a little too upbeat for writing to and some of the words are in English, so that doesn’t quite work for me. But it’d perfect for baking an epic pie;) By the way, I always try to put on appropriate accompany music whenever I’m cooking something. So it’ll be infused with just the right flavors:)

Lee Wind Says:
June 16th, 2010 at 9:56 pm

I love this tip – finding the music for each book really gets me in the mental place for writing it – I love knowing that it’s something other writers do as well! There’s a tone thing that when you nail it, it’s so great… And funny, I’ve found I listen to the same song so many times, just to get myself back in that space!
Thanks for sharing this, (and now I have to go listen to some Sigur Ros to see what you’re up to!)
Namaste,
Lee

Monique Ruiz Says:
June 17th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

The tone of one song totally helps me write the short story. Funny thing is, the stories are too much alike. :o) Now I know I need a different song for each one.
Thank you so much.

Sara Says:
June 17th, 2010 at 1:29 pm

Monique… I love this idea that listening to the same song while writing would produce the same story:) I bet it’s a wonderful story though and a wonderful tone!

Rita Says:
June 17th, 2010 at 5:31 pm

Oh my goodness . . . I cannot write without the soundtrack to my novel playing! And I post-process photos to music, too! It’s just like Lee said, above: when the tone of what you’re creating matches the tone in the music, you feel it. (It definitely affects how the photos turn out!!)

I love the idea of music doing the same for pies and cookies, too. Mmm. It only makes sense!!

Edith Cohn Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 7:10 am

Nice! I am totally going to check out Sigur Ros. My two new bands are The National & Bon Iver. Music=Love

Sara Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 9:07 am

I’m totally gonna check those out! Thanks:)

Leave a Comment »


Tough flowers

May 21st, 2010 by Sara

The other day I visited the Antelope Valley Poppy Reserve. This is pretty much a stretch of hills in the middle of nowhere that is blanketed in orange poppies.

Blankets of PoppiesIt’s an incredible sight, reminiscent of the Wizard of Oz, with orange colored fields stretching into the distance. But the stunning thing to me is that this is all happening in what is essentially a desert. Silvery green sagebrush breaks up the vivid flowers. Tumbleweeds come rolling at you up across the landscape. And rattlesnakes sun themselves on the sandy path.

It amazed me that, in what should be a sparse landscape, such beauty and vibrancy could be found. The plant that fascinated me the most was the false dandelion. It was instantly recognizable as similar to the puffballs we’re used to. But this ‘dandelion’ was shimmery and structured, almost looking like it was made out of glass or quartz crystals. I bent down to study it and hesitantly reached out to touch it, certain the flower would be barbed or sharp. But it was sleek and silky.

False DandelionThe wind was so fierce that it hurt my eardrums. You could lean into it and let it hold you up, imagining you were flying out over the orange hills. But even in that exhilarating, buffeting wind that swept across the landscape, this ‘dandelion’ remained intact. Waiting.

But what was it waiting for? Just the right current of air to blast a seed off of it? Was it waiting for rain? Or the right temperature? I guess in the desert, you have to be sure of your moment.

And I suppose the same is true for a story. The landscape around us is often a bit harsh. If we aren’t careful, we can be swept up in hurricanes of criticism and doubt and cautionary voices. And if we do, we run the risk of our story falling on gritty, dry land.

So while we are crafting each crystalline seedpod, we must shield our stories. We must hold them close and muffle the noise of the wind whipping past. We must build the story as strong as we can and hold tight. This is challenging enough as it is, but then there is a trickier bit.

We must wait.

How can we be sure when it’s the right time to share our stories with others? We can’t. Somewhere there is a balance between giving your story to trusted readers and patiently allowing the story to grow in the protected alcove of your imagination. By letting it go too early, you risk the wind smashing your dandelion apart. But if you never let the story go, it will never take root.

Single poppyIn this dance of risk and trust, each of us has to figure out the timing we feel comfortable with. When to take shelter and when to share. But the most important thing to remember is that even in the desert, lovely things grow.

Posted in Nifty happenings, Writing

Edith Cohn Says:
May 22nd, 2010 at 5:09 am

Beautiful post, Sara! I have to visit that field (maybe in a few weeks??!!!) & I adore the analogy to writing a new book.

Sara Says:
May 22nd, 2010 at 9:55 am

Thanks! I think the poppies might be gone by then, Edith:P But we’ll have to check!

Jenn Bosworth Says:
May 22nd, 2010 at 11:43 am

Well said, m’dear!

Lee Wind Says:
June 2nd, 2010 at 5:51 pm

wow – that was beautiful. the photos, the metaphor, the lesson.
thank you for sharing.
Namaste and a Hug,
Lee

Sara Says:
June 3rd, 2010 at 10:13 am

Thanks! The poppies were _gorgeous_:) Right now I’m wishing I could go back there and hike through them again. But I guess I have to wait till next year!

Leave a Comment »


Turning to the page

May 6th, 2010 by Sara

5-5-10 oil spillThis has been a hard news week. Devastating oil spills, racist laws, memories of Kent State, and tragic flooding in Nashville. Sitting isolated at my desk, I start to question the worth of what I do. When the real world seems to be falling apart around us, does it make sense to turn to fiction?

And the only answer I can come up with is, yes. Yes it does.

Because the only thing I know what to do with my despair and uncertainty is turn to the page. I put my questions down sentence by bewildered sentence. Hoping my characters will be able to find meaning in all this ugliness and create something hopeful with it.

Fiction is our way of making sense of things in a world that doesn’t make sense. In imaginary worlds, we can talk about issues in a context that seems safer than our everyday life. And, in a story, the world must have consistent rules and satisfying, if not hopeful, endings.

Discussing difficult issues has long been the domain of science fiction and, at times, fantasy. It’s no accident that Star Trek had the first interracial kiss on TV. Or that the show has often explored gender roles in both work and love. That distance of time and space allow us, as a culture, to discuss issues that are too difficult in reality.

So when I despair over whether we as a species, a culture, a community will ever grow out of our small-mindedness… Or when I wonder whether we will destroy ourselves before we learn how to take care of our planet… Or life simply seems too cruel…then I let my doubts play themselves out on the page. I give smart, brave characters the same fears I’m struggling with, the same obstacles, and trust that they will find a way out. Through this process I feel the characters’ pain and their doubts, but I also feel something else. Hope.

The Muppet MovieAs a reader or a writer, when I turn to the page, I find hope there. Hope as I watch characters fight to survive whatever is thrown at them. Hope as they find solutions in spite of themselves, in spite of their situations. And I bring that hope back with me. Through the page. Into the world. And then I hold on tight.

Posted in Writing

Rita Says:
May 6th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

I remember once, a long time ago, when my brother told me he planned to join the Peace Corps and then work for the Center for Disease Control (CDC). I was like, “Center for Disease Control?! What good is that?? What the world needs now is more fiction!”

My brother looked at me and was like, “Oh my —.”

I was kidding, of course, in so far as I was trying to rile him up. But I wasn’t kidding, too. :)

Sara Says:
May 7th, 2010 at 3:11 pm

Whenever I really doubt the strength of fiction, I think about the books that affected me and how drastically they influenced the path I’ve taken:)

Suzanne Casamento Says:
May 11th, 2010 at 11:41 am

Great post. And so true. When our characters do something amazing we believe we can too.

Edith Cohn Says:
May 11th, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Awesome post Sara! I suddenly feel so purposeful & bright!

Lee Wind Says:
May 12th, 2010 at 6:21 pm

I love this post. Once again, you’ve stated it beautifully. I love that bit about how we bring hope back from fiction into the real world, into our lives. That’s so right on!
You ROCK!
Namaste,
Lee

Sara Says:
May 13th, 2010 at 11:53 am

Thanks guys:) The oil spill is still all over the news and now reaching the shore. In the midst of this, I still stand by the post, but I want to be out there helping as well!

Leave a Comment »


Tears or Glitter?

April 25th, 2010 by Sara

LA TIMES FESTIVAL OF BOOKSThis weekend I had the privilege of hearing Kate DiCamillo (Because of Winn-Dixie and The Tale of Despereaux) speak at the LA Times Festival of Books. She was one of those wonderful authors whose real-world presence is exactly the same as her writing presence. She speaks with the same quiet, humorous confidence that comes across in her books.

During the question and answer segment, a boy got up and asked her, “Why do your books always have sad endings?” Then he listed off the melancholy endings of book after book.

The Tale of Despereaux

“Well, when you put it like that…” Kate laughed with the audience, looking a little sheepish.  Then she took a minute to really think about the question. She went on to explain that she didn’t mean to write sad endings,  but that life is full of the sad as well as the beautiful, and she tries to write what is in life.

This was a big difference from Meg Cabot (The Princess Diaries) who also talked about the sadness of life in her dynamic speech. But Meg Cabot’s answer to this uncomfortable truth about life, and especially childhood, is to write ‘pretty things.’ She said she wants strong girls and glitter and prettiness as an escape from what might be the bleakness of real life.

IGlitter! found these differing answers to the same truth fascinating. And cleary, judging by the popularity of both their books, both are needed in our world, often by the same readers. Sometimes I want to read a world that has beauty and sadness that reflects our own, but whose stories often make more sense than the seeming randomness of our own lives. But other times, I want to escape, with glitter or dirigibles or princesses, to a world totally unrecognizable from mine.

What struck me the most in these two talks was that both writers, so different in their styles, their presentations, their books, knew why they wrote what they wrote. They were compelled by their subjects and it was this compulsion that led to the confidence in their speaking and in their writing.

Perhaps that is something it takes years to develop. Not just the courage to get your words down on the page or to stand up in front of readers, but a certainty in what you choose to write. Perhaps it is this, more than tears or glitter, that invites us into these authors’ stories. That, word-by-word, builds their worlds around us. And it’s this confidence that makes us want to stay.

Posted in Authors, I heart this book, Nifty happenings, Writing

Joseph Taylor Says:
April 26th, 2010 at 10:51 am

A nice, thoughtful look at two successful children’s authors and some of the reasons for their popularity. Somebody was really taking what she heard to heart! Thanks for sharing, Sara.

Laurie Young Says:
April 26th, 2010 at 11:14 am

Thank you for your thoughts. I had to miss both of those speakers, so this is invaluable!

Suzanne Casamento Says:
April 26th, 2010 at 11:22 am

Great post and a great day at the Festival of Books! Also interesting was knowing why they loved to read. Meg said she read as a child to escape some heaviness at home.

And Kate, as a sickly child, also read to escape.

So knowing why you write what you write has a strong connection to why you read what you read as a kid.

Pretty cool stuff. ; )

Sara Says:
April 26th, 2010 at 11:27 am

Suzanne, that is totally true. I’ve heard so many people say that they write the books they would have loved to have read as a child, but couldn’t find. I take comfort in knowing that a lot more stories are out there for kids to read now. I also like the idea that being certain in what you write is the same as being certain in what you read. And also knowing that both of those can surprise you:)

Edith Cohn Says:
April 27th, 2010 at 6:37 am

Wow. This post lines up a lot with my thinking lately. Thanks, Sara!

Leave a Comment »


Just Because

March 28th, 2010 by Sara

“Just Because” is not an adequate answer for anything. It wasn’t enough when you were four and really wanted Cookie Crisp cereal instead of Rice Krispies. It’s not enough when someone expects you to go along with something, “Because that’s just the way it is.” And it’s never going to be enough of a reason for something to happen in a book.

This week I read a story where the main character has supernatural insight into the life of a long-dead character. In this book, dreams revealed a secondary storyline that was fascinating and mesmerizing.  But not once did the main character wonder why they were having the dreams. Nor did the characters around him, who he shared the dreams with, ask that question either. And not once did anyone wonder if the dreams were real. And while I was intrigued by this unusual plot, I couldn’t help thinking that there was a big “Just Because” involved.

It stands out like gold lame uniforms in Star TrekWriters run into this problem a lot in their stories. You want the story to fork this way, so the character makes that decision. The character needs to be outside for this scene so, of course, that has to happen. And these artificial plot-turns jump out at the reader. In fact, they wave red flags and wear gold lamé and shout ‘Hey! Heeeeeeey! I don’t belong!” And most of the time, you, as a writer, know it.

And so, when your critique group or editor asks, “Why does your character decide to do that?” You put your head in your hands and groan. Because you thought, just this once, you could get away with it. And you have no idea how to fix the problem.

But often these Just Because moments open a door for you. They force you to delve deeper into you character and deeper into your story. What if your story didn’t take that fork, but took the other? What if your character stayed inside the house? What would happen then? It forces you to stop and listen to all of your characters. To look at where your story is going and, more importantly, why it’s going there. And when you do this, you find out that your story and characters have something to say, not just to your audience, but to you too.

So I wonder about this book I read. It was complex and rich, but what if someone along the way had asked the author, “Why is the boy having these dreams? What is happening here that is allowing this connection to happen? Is it magic? Are they real?” And what if the characters themselves had asked these same questions? Maybe the author would have discovered something they didn’t know about their story. Maybe, we as readers, might feel a little more satisfied at the end. And maybe the two plots, instead of looping artfully around each other, would have braided and twined together to create one strong, inseparable story.

Posted in Writing

Dan and Megan Says:
March 28th, 2010 at 9:55 pm

I agree–readers aren’t stupid. Just like sci-fi, fantasy and vampire stories all have to explain their rules and then stick to them, so do all stories have to make clear _why_. Or not. In Act 5, Gertrude drinks the poison intended for Hamlet. Why? I’ve been teaching it for a decade, reading it for longer, and I can’t decisively arrive at a conclusion. Strangely, it only makes me look for more clues the next time I read it. Or wish to heck Shakespeare had left behind some friggin’ journals. Alas…

Sara Says:
March 28th, 2010 at 11:25 pm

Interesting thought… that the lack of explanation can make us think harder. I’m with you on this with some stories. Like in magical realism… often times the author never addresses whether magic is really happening or not. That is for you, as a reader, to decide. But other times, it’s just laziness, hoping that the reader with go with you wherever you are going, even if you don’t fully build the bridge for them to get there.

Edith Cohn Says:
March 29th, 2010 at 5:24 am

Sometimes in setting up a world you can get away with it–but I think you’re right that it’ll probably always enrich the story if you answer “why.”

Lee Wind Says:
April 10th, 2010 at 5:56 am

Great post – and I gotta give it up to you for finding an actual Star Trek red flags and gold lame image! Wow!
Namaste and a Hug,
Lee

Suzanne Casamento Says:
April 23rd, 2010 at 11:37 am

Such a great post. I’m dealing with about 1,000 Jut Becauses right now. Your post gives me hope that in the end, giving them all a “why” will pay off. ; )

Sara Says:
April 23rd, 2010 at 7:28 pm

Thanks! Yeah… those questions kinda make it uncomfortable to write, but they do make it interesting:)

Leave a Comment »


Meep Meeeeep!

February 4th, 2010 by Sara

Last week, we got a new puppy! Huzzah! Four-month-old Kitsu is adorable and fox-like and endlessly entertaining. But as I’ve watched her stalking dust bunnies, pouncing on shadows, and chasing her tail, I’ve been forcefully reminded of my own writing process.

See, during the past months of revision, I daydreamed about starting a new story. I’d sit next to a waterlily-filled pond somewhere, seized by inspiration, scribbling down long, brilliant paragraphs. (Why a pond? Especially since Laptop+Water= Tragedy) Anyway, my thoughts would weave themselves together, creating a manuscript with a beginning you couldn’t put down, an intriguing middle, AND a surprising, yet inevitable ending.

Instead, I’ve found the process of writing a first draft just like I remembered it, clumsy and full of doubt. And clumsy isn’t fun. Surprisingly, neither is doubt.

And suddenly, I wished I was revising again. In hindsight, revision seems like strolling through a lovely greenhouse, rearranging plants, watering this one here, pruning that one there. Now, I find myself back on a dusty plain with a handful of seeds and a empty watering can. True, I can create whatever I want in this vast open space, but first I have to find some water, figure out what kind of seeds I have, and get digging. All of this is awkward, hard work that leaves your hands calloused and caked with mud.

Meepmeep!

Wow. Sorry, I guess I got a little carried away with myself there. Plus now, I have two competing metaphors. Puppies and gardening. Hmmm… better throw in a third one, just for good measure.

Vroom! Meep, Meep!

Right now, in the middle of my first draft, I can hear the Road Runner, I can see him, but he just keeps racing in dizzying circles around me. For the last few weeks, I’ve been forging ahead anyway. Since I know my beginning and I know my ending, surely I can find a path between the two points. But somewhere in the middle there, the story gets boring. And I’ve learned to heed the warning signs. When you sit down to write a scene and you think to yourself, ‘Ugh!’ then whoever reads it is going to think ‘Ugh!’ too.

I’ve figured out that something is missing in my story and it’s as elusive and taunting as the Road Runner himself. But this morning and Right?every morning, I will sit down at my computer and start again, creating contraptions, building traps, and scheming new schemes. After all, I’m Wile E. Coyote, Suuuuuper Gen-i-us and I’m bound to catch him sometime, right?

Right?

Posted in First draft, Revision, Writing

Peggy Abrahams Says:
February 4th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

Ha ha! Very funny. I feel like I’m chasing my tail with the first draft of my WIP right now too. Maybe a greenhouse is what I need. Kitsu is adorable.

Sara Says:
February 5th, 2010 at 11:25 am

Thanks:) She’s definitely stolen our hearts. Peggy, I wish less chasing of our tails and more mice catching for us both. Figuratively, of course:)

Beverley BevenFlorez Says:
February 8th, 2010 at 10:06 pm

In my version of Looney Toons, Wile E. Coyote catches the Road Runner and Sylvester eats Tweety Bird. ;)

Sara Says:
February 9th, 2010 at 11:05 am

I’m watching your show then! Muwahahaha!

Rita Says:
February 9th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Awwww, what a perfect end image!

I love the writing/gardening metaphor! The grass is always greener on the other side: except in your version, one side is a desert and one a greenhouse. What a fun place this is.

I dreamed of dogs because of you. In real life I’m not comfortable around them, but the premise of the dream was that I loved them and that, in fact, all these dogs in my house were mine. So I was going up to them, making myself pet them and say their names and not be afraid of these hyperactive creatures–reminding myself they were mine–wondering why I felt so weird.

Lee Wind Says:
February 18th, 2010 at 10:43 am

Right!
Sara – this was great! You sure do know how to wield a metaphor, and you somehow always manage to make it about writing. Wow. I wish I knew how you did that. Love the video and photo of kitsu…
Namaste and a Hug,
Lee

Beverley BevenFlorez Says:
March 11th, 2010 at 8:26 am

I wanted to let you know that I gave you the “One Lovely Blog Award” today. :)

Leave a Comment »


Stranger than Fiction

January 27th, 2010 by Sara

Last week, while I was driving home, a patch of dense fog materialized on the dark road in front of me. The thing is, it wasn’t a foggy night. I wasn’t near water and there was no dip in the road.  And yet, I could barely see through the white mist in front of me. My mind raced as I drove nearer to it. Was this somehow a super creepy section of road? Had something awful happened here? Where there ghosts?

As I slowed down, my mind pieced the clues together. A large spotlight. A long white trailer. A caution sign. It was a movie set. And I was driving through a patch of fake fog, the movie’s fiction intruding on my reality. Jack Hodgins

The next day, it happened again. Not fog, but the crossover of fantasy into real life. I’d been at home, watching the tv show, Bones (I can’t resist a good mystery) and then I went to meet my critique group. When I walked into the coffee shop, there was Jack Hodgins, the forensic entomologist, sitting at a table. And the just question popped into my mind before I could stop it…Was I in an episode of Bones? Was a mystery unfolding around me right now? A second later, my brain kicked in and I realized I was being silly. That I lived in LA and it was just the actor, out for coffee with a friend.

Because walking into a fictional world would be ridiculous, right?

Right?

I suspect that the lines between fantasy and reality aren’t as solid as we like to think. That a good story leaks out, like fog across a dark road. As a writer, you might be the one who imagines the characters and put the words down. But once the words are read, that story becomes part of another person’s imagination and then another’s and another’s, spiderwebbing far beyond the edges of the page.

Spooky! Scary!Because who hasn’t felt the back wall of their closet, hoping to get to Narnia. Or squeezed their eyes tight and tried to make something move, hoping to get an invitation to Hogwarts. Or be visited by Obi Wan. When you’re creating new places for readers to inhabit, this overlap can be exciting, and not a little unnerving. Because the power of story is insistent and infectious. It spreads and morphs and grows. And as it does, you realize that the world of words is not quite as safe as you once believed it to be.

Posted in Writing

Edith Cohn Says:
January 28th, 2010 at 6:47 am

Now I’m scared!! So scared! *runs to hide behind her Majesty Queen Sofa*

Sara Says:
January 28th, 2010 at 11:19 am

No! Not scared! Brave and empowered!
Oh shoot… ;)

Stephanie Denise Brown Says:
January 28th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

This is the PERFECT entry for my students to read just as the semester begins. You speak about the heart of the story being words, and how those words are so powerful is what every English instructor wishes for her students to know. Thank you!

Sara Says:
January 28th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

Wow! thanks so much. That is a very high compliment and you put it quite beautifully yourself, Stephanie! I think that this very idea is the reason I write for teens, because the stories I read during those years are the ones that stayed with me, guiding me, haunting me, and inspiring me even now.

Beverley BevenFlorez Says:
January 30th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

I love your blog, Sara. I’m running to my mailbox looking for my letter to Hogwarts now. :)

Sara Says:
February 2nd, 2010 at 6:06 pm

Let me know if you get in!! I TOTALLY wanna come visit!

Suzanne Casamento Says:
February 4th, 2010 at 11:32 am

Love it! I think you should write dense fog as a portal…

Suzanne Casamento Says:
February 4th, 2010 at 11:33 am

Ooo. I love it. I think you should write dense fog as a portal…

Rita Says:
February 9th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

Lovely. Mystical clouds are how you know you’re entering a fantasy, you know. That’s what my friend and I decided when looking at book covers the other day . . .

Leave a Comment »


Book Goggles

December 3rd, 2009 by Sara

So.

I’m 2 chapters out, and one week away from finishing my revision, and my back aches from sitting at the computer. And there’s no food in the refrigerator. And worst of all, I can’t think about anything except my book. A writer friend assures me that this dire condition is common and even has a name.Addlepated

But every book I read, every movie I watch, everything people say to me leads me straight back to my book. And occasionally this obsession can be helpful. Inspiration will strike and I’ll finally have an answer for some problem that’s been plaguing me.

But most of the time, it’s fake inspiration. I’ll go into my manuscript to make my brilliant fix and find out that I’d already fixed it. Weeks ago.

Deja aha? Glitch in the matrix? Call it what you will, it’s still annoying. But I have a suspicion that it’s also necessary.

Because if everything, dreams, conversations, meatloaf, reminds you of your book, then you have these moments. When you can hear the underlying tension in your character’s voice. When you can see the crooked smirk and raised eyebrow when they deliver a line. When you can stand next to your main character and stare out the window with them, seeing the same footprints in the wet grass, the same dull blue of the sky, and the very same thoughts running through your heads.

Because the moment you see reality through the world you created… then you’re wearing book goggles.

Posted in Writing

Edith Cohn Says:
December 7th, 2009 at 8:55 am

Yay! The book goggles post! You are rockin those goggles in that photo too! So fun!! Did u wear them to the scifi party?

Sara Says:
December 8th, 2009 at 11:07 am

Glad you’re gonna be wearing your book goggles again soon too!
http://edithspage.livejournal.com/53246.html

Mary Says:
December 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

We love you goggle-girl! And “Congratulations on completing your revisions!” During the Christmas “vacation” perhaps you will get a break from the goggles. But I am not sure if that is a good thing. Maybe… I can certainly see that living 34-7 with your character is what makes a story worth writing. Here’s an idea: Just bring her/him along. Theres’ always room for more at the Etienne Christmas table. We’ll have the goggles ready. Well, we may have to substitute our family nose&glasses. –Mom

Sara Says:
December 16th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

A few of my characters are krazee troublemakers… wait… I guess they’d just fit right in then:) Hope they all pack light!

Lee Wind Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 11:23 am

“book goggles” is a great way to put it, and yours look awesome!
Happy Happy New Year,
Hugs,
Lee

Katie McDee Says:
January 10th, 2010 at 1:20 pm

Loved this post and can’t wait to read your book. Seriously, you are the shiz!

Leave a Comment »


Kevlar

November 20th, 2009 by Sara

In the TV show Castle, the amazing Nathan Fillion plays a mystery writer, Rick Castle, who works with the police to solve crimes. Believable? No. Amusing? Yes.I heart Nathan Fillion!

Anyway, Rick Castle occasionally wears a bullet proof vest, but instead of ‘POLICE,’ his says ‘WRITER.’ My friend, and brilliant writer, Alexandra Amor recently asked me, “What writer couldn’t use one of those?”

Her question got me thinking about the public and private nature of writing stories. One day we see something, maybe a dog wearing goggles and riding around in a basket on a motorcycle. And we think, who buys their dog goggles?

Or we eavesdrop on a strange couple at a restaurant and hear the woman say to the man, “That’s the nicest thing you’ve said to me all day!” and you wonder, what else has he said to her?  And poof! A story is born.

Then we go to our computers and start typing away, creating a whole world out of that one little question. This process is done in a state of delusion. The delusions that we can make people see the same thing we do. Because even if we write in a coffee shop, surrounded by people, we’re alone in our imaginations, trying to translate what’s in our heads onto paper.

So, in our vacuum, we scribble, tweak, and rearrange until everything’s as perfect as we can get it. Then we send our story out into the world. If we’re unlucky, it comes back to us, not quite right for the person we sent it to. And that hurts.

And if we’re lucky? Hundreds of people read it. Thousands. If we’re really really lucky? Hundreds of thousands. Millions even. Then we’re in real trouble.

Cause then our story, our rough translation of the masterpiece we envisioned, has to stand on its own. We have to rely on our string of words to weave worlds and speak the truth. Some people will love it and some people will hate it. And a few special people will see exactly what we saw. And for them the story will be magic and it will stay with them for the rest of their lives.

And through all of this, we, the writer, have to watch from the sidelines. All of the risk and none of the control. No wonder we need Kevlar.

Posted in Authors, Revision, Writing

Edith Cohn Says:
November 20th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

SCBWI summer conference, let’s wear bullet proof WRITER vests! (In the theme color of course!) Think it could double as a life vest if we fell in the pool after too many theme-colored cocktails?

BTW, I was there, wasn’t I? When the woman said, “That’s the nicest thing you’ve said to me all day?” It didn’t end up in my story, but that would be so neat if it had. ;)

Sara Says:
November 20th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

You were definitely there, Edith:) I was excited to finally be able to use it! Unfortunately, I lost the picture I took of the dog with goggles, but I bet you can use your imagination.

Stephanie Denise Brown Says:
November 21st, 2009 at 1:21 pm

I watch Castle on ABC religiously! I’m crossing my fingers that Santa brings me season 1 on DVD for Christmas; since I had to teach a class in the evenings last semester, I missed quite a bit of season 1.

It is a scary thought, having all those readers dissect the work. As you said, some will love it and some will hate it.

I think both emotions are good! That’s why my biggest fear is being the kind of writer whose work is received so lukewarm that it doesn’t incite any strong emotions. That would truly be scary! I wouldn’t need a vest at all–and where’s the fun in that?!

Sara Says:
November 21st, 2009 at 6:05 pm

Stephanie, I totally agree with you! The no response, no vest scenario would be the worst. I feel better now, cause you’re right, there wouldn’t be any fun in that. I can see why you like Castle, you guys have the same sense of adventure:) Thanks for the new point of view:)

Leave a Comment »


© 1999-2007 Sara Wilson Etienne
rss link
home stories links about archive contact